Quality in Reality - an overview -
From a simple shopping experience we can distinguish between 2 or more trends for the same kind of good or product - just like soap for example - , dozen of trends are labeled these goods , but in a unique normal nature we just remember a few number of these trends , also from experience , some of the remembered ones we found it not good in compare to its huge grades of fame , from this simple intro. we have put in spot the main meaning which is called " Quality in Reality " .
............
Why we need Quality ? , Is Quality always a beneficial parameter ? , Quality games < Does it really matters ? , why we fall in the traps of fake quality ad. ?
to answer these questions we need at first to scratch up the real touchable Quality , or as we can also call it " Quality experience " , it is generally defined as the experience we gain along our periods of living toward goods , products and services we exploit - this is a consumer's perspective definition - , this perspective is came because of the " Quality action " which can be really noticed in the processes of consuming , this experience is divided into two sorts , the 1st sort is the conscious experience and the 2nd sort is the under-conscious experience , from this simple general definition we can reach the conclusion of that almost ads seeks to make huge concentration toward the 2nd sort of " Quality experience " , why ? - if you wonder - , because the under-conscious experience is the big machine for human behavior , even though we give really huge attention the conscious experience , we don't give the same attention to the under-conscious one , also the under-conscious one can't be easily stopped or controlled , as our main natural habit is to follow our under-conscious orders without any tangible and noticeable refuse or criticize .
......
Why we need Quality ? , we need - simply - " Quality " to enhance the benefits from every unit of the " consumed units " , reducing the limits of the unsatisfactory actions and effects which are resulted from the consuming processes , Quality simply means the highest values of the beneficial and the needed characteristics , the lower values of the unsatisfactory characteristics , or just zeroing it - if it's possible - . so then why we need Quality ? , because we need good benefits at its highest rates with the lowest rates of any side effects or without it - if it possible - .
......
Is Quality always a beneficial parameter ? , from a consumer's perspective - as we described before - the answer is " surely yes " , but from other perspectives the answer may not stay steady on " surely yes " . let's take a part of the consumer's perspective , we - before - confessed that there's a sort of " Quality experience " which has unconscious side into its main function , you may ask , do our unconscious sides in ourselves always take the right decisions and receives the full view of any subject ?! , the answer tends to be " not always " , and from this answer we can reach that this sort of " Quality " may not be beneficial for us - the consumers - even if we were satisfied of the product . this is actually an open gate for " Quality games " , which are based and designed in trial of answering weird questions like these examples which says " how can I made the consumer satisfied from my product even if it isn't enough in it's real Quality - which is known by huge benefit and less side effects - ? , how can I made a good ad for any fake Quality products or services ? , and etc. " .
from this we notice that the " real Quality " is only for the " producer " , and there's less or no of " real Quality " for the " consumer " , as we all know that the producer has the upper hand on the consumer .
But can we swap places between the consumer's and producer's situation of owing the " real Quality " ? , yes it's possible to be made . take the clear example of " colonization " or " occupation " , you may notice that the producers of the products are the " occupied people , slaves , blackmailed people , and cheap workers " , they take less or no " real Quality " , even though the consumers - who are belongs to the occupier side - take more and high of " real Quality " . also in the production systems in the third world countries , you can see bosses take more and high of " real Quality " and the workers - in the other side - take less or no " real Quality " , an so on .
Also there are levels of win-win situations , in which we see that producers , managers , bosses , workers , and the rest of the elements take good rates of " real Quality " together .
these are the " relative Quality " assumptions situations .
.........
To summarize what is previously written : victim or friend , regardless the form you are being while you are dealing with your " Quality experience " , lose & gain proceeds and sorts , always ask yourself this question over and over : " Do I really take the " real Quality " ? " , even if you feel that you take the " real Quality " , even if you tend to answer by " yes " or even " surely yes " , don't stop asking yourself this question , this is according to the " duality principle " - that we've talked about before in this article ( http://bestseeker.blogspot.com/2013/10/absorbing-good-from-bad-duality.html ) - which states that : " deep inside the disaster absorb the benefit , and deep inside the benefit reveal any disaster " .
at last I wish you always the best .
.................
Enjoy
...........
seeking 4 the best
............
Why we need Quality ? , Is Quality always a beneficial parameter ? , Quality games < Does it really matters ? , why we fall in the traps of fake quality ad. ?
to answer these questions we need at first to scratch up the real touchable Quality , or as we can also call it " Quality experience " , it is generally defined as the experience we gain along our periods of living toward goods , products and services we exploit - this is a consumer's perspective definition - , this perspective is came because of the " Quality action " which can be really noticed in the processes of consuming , this experience is divided into two sorts , the 1st sort is the conscious experience and the 2nd sort is the under-conscious experience , from this simple general definition we can reach the conclusion of that almost ads seeks to make huge concentration toward the 2nd sort of " Quality experience " , why ? - if you wonder - , because the under-conscious experience is the big machine for human behavior , even though we give really huge attention the conscious experience , we don't give the same attention to the under-conscious one , also the under-conscious one can't be easily stopped or controlled , as our main natural habit is to follow our under-conscious orders without any tangible and noticeable refuse or criticize .
......
Why we need Quality ? , we need - simply - " Quality " to enhance the benefits from every unit of the " consumed units " , reducing the limits of the unsatisfactory actions and effects which are resulted from the consuming processes , Quality simply means the highest values of the beneficial and the needed characteristics , the lower values of the unsatisfactory characteristics , or just zeroing it - if it's possible - . so then why we need Quality ? , because we need good benefits at its highest rates with the lowest rates of any side effects or without it - if it possible - .
......
Is Quality always a beneficial parameter ? , from a consumer's perspective - as we described before - the answer is " surely yes " , but from other perspectives the answer may not stay steady on " surely yes " . let's take a part of the consumer's perspective , we - before - confessed that there's a sort of " Quality experience " which has unconscious side into its main function , you may ask , do our unconscious sides in ourselves always take the right decisions and receives the full view of any subject ?! , the answer tends to be " not always " , and from this answer we can reach that this sort of " Quality " may not be beneficial for us - the consumers - even if we were satisfied of the product . this is actually an open gate for " Quality games " , which are based and designed in trial of answering weird questions like these examples which says " how can I made the consumer satisfied from my product even if it isn't enough in it's real Quality - which is known by huge benefit and less side effects - ? , how can I made a good ad for any fake Quality products or services ? , and etc. " .
from this we notice that the " real Quality " is only for the " producer " , and there's less or no of " real Quality " for the " consumer " , as we all know that the producer has the upper hand on the consumer .
But can we swap places between the consumer's and producer's situation of owing the " real Quality " ? , yes it's possible to be made . take the clear example of " colonization " or " occupation " , you may notice that the producers of the products are the " occupied people , slaves , blackmailed people , and cheap workers " , they take less or no " real Quality " , even though the consumers - who are belongs to the occupier side - take more and high of " real Quality " . also in the production systems in the third world countries , you can see bosses take more and high of " real Quality " and the workers - in the other side - take less or no " real Quality " , an so on .
Also there are levels of win-win situations , in which we see that producers , managers , bosses , workers , and the rest of the elements take good rates of " real Quality " together .
these are the " relative Quality " assumptions situations .
.........
To summarize what is previously written : victim or friend , regardless the form you are being while you are dealing with your " Quality experience " , lose & gain proceeds and sorts , always ask yourself this question over and over : " Do I really take the " real Quality " ? " , even if you feel that you take the " real Quality " , even if you tend to answer by " yes " or even " surely yes " , don't stop asking yourself this question , this is according to the " duality principle " - that we've talked about before in this article ( http://bestseeker.blogspot.com/2013/10/absorbing-good-from-bad-duality.html ) - which states that : " deep inside the disaster absorb the benefit , and deep inside the benefit reveal any disaster " .
at last I wish you always the best .
.................
Enjoy
...........
seeking 4 the best
Comments
Post a Comment